Compatibility Basics: Three Principles More Important Than Match Scores

Compatibility analysis is most useful for reading interaction patterns, not declaring relationship fate.

Binary right-wrong framing often blocks dialogue and increases defensive behavior.

When challenging signals overlap, prioritize fact-check conversations before emotional conclusion conversations.

When supportive signals overlap, use the window for explicit short-term and long-term agreements.

Use request-based statements instead of blame-based statements. This single shift reduces escalation probability.

Limit high-tension talks to short blocks and resume after cooldown intervals.

A realistic metric is recovery speed after disagreement, not the complete absence of conflict.

Monthly compatibility logging is often enough to identify repeated interaction loops.